Author : Jordan McPeltUS immigration (i e emigration to America) policies have always supported the movement of non-American residents to the US Migration to the country has been the chief source of growth of population and cultural changes throughout the history of America

The economic, political and social aspects of migration have been the basis of a big controversy concerning religion, ethnicity, settlement patterns, job growth, and economic benefits These aspects have a heavy impact on work habits, moral values, social mobility, nationalities, levels of criminality and political loyalties US Immigration policies were one of the main hot issues of discussion and debate during the recent presidential elections These have also been spoken of as being obsolete, outdated and inconsistent with the existing situation of the American economy

As per the data till 2006, the United States of America takes in more legal immigrants as permanent inhabitants when compared with other nations of the world President Obama believes in fixing the dysfunctional migration system He also is supportive towards increasing the amount of legal immigrants entering the country every year According to him, this would help keep families united and also would meet the serious demand for skilled workers Those places the employers find it hard to fill can be filled in by legal immigrants who are qualified for the job

However, the main problem is the increasing number of illegal immigrants This undocumented population comprises of either people who have entered the country illegally or are over staying their permit It is useless to conduct raids too Employers also play a part in exploiting such workers by paying them less than the minimum wages and some of them also deny the immigrants employer compensated benefits such as health care The immigration laws and bureaucracy are outdated and flawed which make it hard for immigrants to get permits They have to wait for years with their applications

President Obama and Vice President Biden together plan to build secure borders The entry ports and borders are to be strengthened with additional infrastructure, technology and personnel to preserve their integrity They also have plans to track down employers hiring illegal immigrants and bring them before the law This will discourage people from entering without a legal permit

The Obama Immigration policies also are in favor of a system that would allow illegal immigrants who have a good reputation to pay a penalty, study English and then again be eligible to apply for a permit to become American citizens They also intend to support financial growth and development in Mexico so as to decrease the number of illegal immigrants from there

Obama Immigration also proposed the creation of a system that would allow employers to verify the status of their employees before hiring them He also wishes to join Rep Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) in the introduction of the Citizenship Promotion Act, which would ensure that the application fees for immigration into the country are very fair and affordable He has also passed a Legislation that improved the accuracy and speed of background checks conducted by the FBI Jordan Mcpelt is a professional author who specializes in

Read full story

Author : Shawn WilsonHaving compatible views and opinions on how to live your lives is an important part of making a relationship work After all, when you’re always on the same page about your lives and the world around you, you don’t have too much to argue about in the first place But for most relationships, that’s a lot to ask With different backgrounds and different basic perspectives on the world, it doesn’t often happen that a person’s every opinion coincides with his or her partner’s

And in few places is this more dramatic than with politics When you’re on the left and she’s on the right (or vice versa!) it can sometimes create a lot of strain between you Some people believe that that bit of strain adds spice Others think it’s a sign that the relationship has little chance of working out But what, really, is the truth? Will differences in your political opinions get in the way of your relationship?

Politics Polarize

In most relationships where each individual has a different political perspective, it’s easy to see that politics can get in the way Why? Because what a person believes politically has a lot to do with their personal and moral values If somebody is on the conservative side politically, they may be there for religious or moral reasons, or just because their basic values match up with conservative opinions And the same for the left

The truth is, politics in and of themselves aren’t important But values are And when your politics are simply a reflection of your values, having a partner with opposing feelings can cause a lot of fighting and frustration There are even practical concerns to keep in mind If, for instance, a pro-choice liberal marries a pro-life conservative, their differences in opinions may cause big problems when it comes to family planning

In short, political differences can seem small and unimportant at the beginning of a relationship But as time wears on, those differences can become bigger and bigger And if you’re not careful, they may even take over your relationship

Political Differences Add a Spark

Does all the doom and gloom above sound a little scary? Fortunately, there’s also a positive side to political incompatibility While having very different political points of view won’t necessarily make things easier, it can make things a little more fun After all, where’s the fun in agreeing all the time?

In some couples, political polarization works for them rather than against them It gives them something to debate and argue about that has nothing to do with their relationship Because it’s not personal –it’s not about either of the individuals who are actually in the relationship– politics can be a way to blow off steam without damaging your relationship or hurting each other

And then there’s the fun you’ll have after the argument is over When you’re feeling hot and passionate at the end of a conversation, who knows where that might lead in the bedroom? A little extra passion is, after all, never a bad thing

Keeping Politics from Getting in the Way

Unless you specify party affiliation requirements on your internet dating profile, you’re not always going to end up with somebody with whom you see eye-to-eye Fortunately, even if politics are more about your values than your political opinions, your differences in perspective don’t have to break your relationship To keep politics from becoming a problem it’s important to remember to:

Take things lightly If you find that your political conversation is getting a little too serious, look on the lighter side Making a joke is the best way to break the tension And to make political discussions fun rather than frustrating

Respect their opinions Listen to what the other person has to say, and be open minded about their perspective Your opinion on the basic issue might not change, but that doesn’t mean your partner might not have a few interesting ideas, too

Don’t try to change them This is probably the most important of the three Sharing political views with your partner isn’t about trying to win them over to your side Chances are, you’re never going to be able to covert them, so don’t even try Instead, simply exchange ideas and listen to one another It’s the most you can ask for This article was written by Shawn Wilson, a member of the customer support team at Datepad, where we always offer free internet dating. Datepad has a massive directory of informative free dating articles along with a great list of dating site reviews on our dating blog.

Read full story

Author : Derek DashwoodFrom his youth Alexander was tutored by an elderly Plato in the ways of people and the wisdom of the ages As a youth Plato had listened at the feet of Socrates Alexander learned to look at all aspects of a situation This is reflected when his father, King Phillip of Macedonia, and his followers all failed to mount and ride a mighty horse brought to sell to Phillip as a sales opportunity to own the most powerful horse in the land Alexander was the last to try, after pleading with his father, who was afraid the horse would hurt the boy

Alexander may be the first on record of the fabled horse whisperers Alexander turned Bucephalus around as he had noticed the horse was afraid of his own shadow, which he no longer saw, facing the other way now After a period of Alexander relating to Bucephalus, whispering and stroking the huge beast, then mounting him and riding around pleasantly, Bucephalus was purchased for Alexander King Philip exclaimed that Alexander should look for a kingdom larger than Macedonia as it was not large enough to hold him

As history shows this was a prophetic statement Yet Alexander was more than a brilliant tactician and fierce warrior who could inspire confidence in his men, he held loyalty for service on a high level of understanding When his beloved horse Bucephalus died in India years later, Alexander mourned as if he had lost a blood brother, and had a town built in his beloved steeds memory To beging with however, Alexander was always the best at everything In the private school reserved for princes of Greece, where Plato taught The school was built specially by King Philip in the place of Platos birth

So this was a chance to later impress and pursuade all Greece if he could dominate these boys, and he did Alexanders school mates were the other princes of Greece and nearby kingdoms As they all grew and took power over their own kingdoms, they were easily convinced by Alexander to join in what all else seemed to think was an impossible dream: to attack and conquer Persia All else in history had been the reverse Mighty Persia controlled vast portions of the near and middle east They controlled all of Turkey which had them always it seemed at the Gates to Greece, Athens and Sparta in particular

Always the attacks with superior forces came from Persia whether by land or sea Persia was determined and the Greeks and Macedonians were in a state of constant siege When the time came Alexander had his men ferried across into Persian territory on the west coast of present day Turkey His ten thousand Greek and Macedonian soldiers faced the army of Persia King Darius was at the back of them, and they faced off against each other

The Greeks turned their columns of sixteen foot poles sharpened to a tip which then created massacre, slaughter, Persian soldiers fleeing, as did King Darius when he saw and realized that these were ten thousand warriors of a class he had never before seen
It seemed an impossibility than ten thousand could defeat one hundred thousand Persian soldiers But with the innovation of his front line weapon Alexander had the men equipped with a sixteen foot sharpened pole, which they attacked first The Persians, equipped only with bows, arrows and short swords, parted like the sea in front of this new force The Greeks were skewering Persians soldiers before they had a chance to use their swords, their arrows did little harm as the Greeks moved into a wedge shape and attacked directly into the midst of the Persians

Darius tried to escape but was killed by his own men who fell to their knees in homage to Alexander and his men Alexander ordered gentle treatment of the women and fair discipline only when need for the soldiers All Persia soon became his and he burned the old capital Persepolis Wishing to place a permanent imprint into modern day Turkey and Iran, Alexander married Roxanne, a beautiful daughter of the defeated King Darius, and had ten thousand of his men also take a Persian bride Today in old Persia there are apparently quite a few lads named Alexander, with blue eyes, in what had been Persia Derek Dashwood finds history fascinating and how enemies at one time are friends another time
Greek Antiques

Read full story

Author : Ann KnappChange: now that’s a word we’ve all gotten used to hearing

From its use (ubiquitous, sometimes annoying, and ultimately very successful) in a–well, a world-changing presidential campaign to its sudden prominence in our economic lives–how many finance titans have pronounced the words “the rules have changed” in the last several months?–we’ve all heard a lot about change in 2008 And we’re going to hear more With Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress and a President with fewer Washington-insider connections than anyone since the 1970s, it’s safe to say that a lot of old laws and policies are going to be up for renegotiation

So cigar aficionados may be wondering whether, given the general spirit of revision, the United States’ long-term boycott of Cuba may be on the way to the chopping block as well The incoming administration has already signaled its willingness to meet with regimes generally considered anti-US–including that of Cuba–and the Cuba embargo seems like just the sort of policy that the new President may reconsider It’s old, it hasn’t achieved its objective, and some policy and foreign affairs experts–as well as any number of United States cigar aficionados–would like to see it gone

Let’s consider the charges one by one “Old”: The trade embargo has been active, in one form or another, since 1962, with a couple of brief respites After all, US-Cuba relations weren’t exactly friendly even before that The trade embargo was enacted on President John F Kennedy’s watch, and the Camelot president was a well-known cigar aficionado himself

According to his own press secretary, Pierre Salinger, JFK himself ordered Salinger to stock up on H Upmann’s the night before the embargo went into effect, and didn’t sign the order until Salinger brought the boxes of cigars to the president himself With a couple of brief exceptions under Jimmy Carter and others–the embargo has remained in place ever since It has even been strengthened on a number of occasions, as during the early George W Bush presidency

“May not have achieved its objective”: whatever anyone’s opinion on the embargo, no one can claim that it has appreciably loosened Fidel Castro’s grip on power Only recent bouts with ill health seems to have phased a dictator who survived even the death of the Soviet Union, an event which left his island communist republic standing alone, with no powerful trading partner buying its exports and no military superpower watching its back Even in severe international isolation, with terrible poverty and unemployment, Castro’s regime has held itself more or less together

Likewise, Cuba’s dominance in the cigar industry has faced a number of challenges, especially from the Dominican Republic Some of Cuba’s best cigar makers left the island, either immediately after Castro’s rise to power or during the course of a Cuba-initiated exchange program in which cigar makers went to teach their trade to interested parties in other Latin American countries (Often, after getting out of Cuba, these folks stayed out, creating what has sometimes been called the “cigar diaspora “) But even with these challenges, and with United States cigar fans unable to buy its wares, Cuba remains a cigar powerhouse, rivaled only by (as stated above) the DR, Nicaragua and Honduras So the embargo’s justification will have, and has had for some time, to rest on something other than its efficacy in achieving its stated goal

“Controversial”: A number of former and current diplomats and experts on Central American politics have argued that the embargo only strengthens Fidel Castro by giving him an external enemy he can blame his country’s problems on Others argue that it may be keeping Cubans in unnecessary poverty And cigar aficionados, of course, argue that it keeps them from enjoying some of the most famous cigars on earth! (There are, of course, two sides to this story; the embargo’s supporters are quick to point out that it prevents the United States from acquiescing to a regime with a less-than-savory human rights record )

So with all these factors against it, and a liberal, change-oriented president in charge, surely the embargo is on its way out and we can all look forward to lighting up some Habanos S A , right? Don’t hold your breath Any change that does go forward will do so only after considerable congressional review–given the economic situation, opening up trade with Cuba is probably not high on the new President’s to-do list, and the new President himself is known for his cautious, plodding personal style–his refusal to make snap decisions And the Cuban embargo is beloved by several population groups with whom the bridge-building, fence-mending Obama is probably looking for ways to make nice–hardline conservatives and Cuban refugees chief among them So it may happen, but probably not within the first, or even second, hundred days CigarFox provides you the opportunity to build your own sampler of the finest cigars that include cigar brands like Montecristo, Romeo & Julieta, H Upmann, Macanudo, Cohiba, Partagas, Gurkha and many more. Choose from more than 1200 different cigars! Other cigar products include cigar humidors, cigar boxes, and cigar accessories like Zippo Lighters.

Read full story

Author : David MaillieIt means we have rights Rights that many have fought for and given their lives for Unfortunately in current America there is, for the most part, two separate classes of citizenship, a bipartisanship if you will You have the poor and then you have the wealthy Yes, there is a middle class, but the republicans and George Bush are slowly getting rid of this class Their reason for this is simple The middle class does not like a government that only favors the rich and it has a voice The middle class also provides a door for many to become rich The rich and wealthy do not like the poor and they do not like to fraternize outside of their class So, needless to say, if the republicans (the rich and wealthy) have their way there will only be two classes left, the poor and the wealthy

Basically, this is how it works In America you have a right to great health care if you are rich or have a great employer sponsored plan Due to the rising cost of healthcare many employers are limiting or ending these plans for employees Of course, at the same time, executives are actually getting more benefits than ever So basically, the reality is you have a right to marginal health care The great health care George Bush says we have is reserved for the rich

You also have the right to vote What you do not know and the government does not want you to know is that your votes do not count or matter Just look at the close election between George Bush and Al Gore Al Gore really won, but Jeb Bush, George Bushs brother and Governor of Florida played around with Floridas votes and voila George won This is even though he had fewer votes If you watched Michael Moores documentary Farenheit 9/11 you will see that many voters were outraged that their votes were not included This was especially so with lower class and primarily black or African Americans None were allowed to have a voice or make a formal complaint because they needed a senator to back them and of course none would speak out against Jeb or George Bush What happened here is simple, George and Jeb Bush have conspired to great political power in a very seedy way What they did was dig up dirt and such on every political official that might become a problem and let them know what they have so they would just let this happen This is not a true democracy It is becoming more like socialist Russia 20 years ago How can we liberate Iraq when we are not liberated ourselves?

You have the right or responsibility to pay taxes Yes, only in America do the rich on average pay only 1 percent or less of their income in taxes while the middle class and lower class pay on average 35 percent of their income Only the rich can afford powerful tax attorneys and fancy tax havens It was recently made known that many of the rich have even set up trusts in childrens names that they do not have Do not worry, yo are rich, the government probably will not catch it and if they do you will get off real easy Just make a campaign contribution or two to George Bush Its amazing what you can get away with in America if you have money Look at O J Simpson You can literally kill someone and then hide your assets so no one can touch your money O J claimed he was broke and had no funds Right Just look at each presidents outgoing list of pardons when they leave office Its all full of only rich and wealthy people looking to escape felonies and similar that would put most Americans behind bars for many years If you are rich and are facing something awful, just make a donation or two of $500,000 to a presidents library fund or similar and you will be amazed at what you can get away with

As citizens we are not guilty until proven innocent Actually, the poor are basically guilty, and the rich will get out of it, regardless Actually, the rich do not even get arrested sometimes Just look at Senator Kennedy You can drive drunk, hit a concrete barrier, be observed as being drunk by several sworn officers and be driven home The rest of us would be given the breathalizer and thrown in the drunk tank to await a court date for either DUI or DWUI (as senator Kennedy claimed it was a medication problem) He was drunk or under the influence and could have killed someone

There are many more rights that we have or do not really have and are actually reserved for the rich and wealthy, but I will get into those in a later article I am busy now reading an article from the Associated Press on how George Bushss wife, the first lady, ran a stop sign when she was 17 and killed someone but she was never charged with any crime Yes America is a truly great democracy, but only if you are rich and wealthy For more great controversial and eye opening information please visit Bestbraindrain.com You will be glad you did. Go there now and be enlightened to what really goes on in America and elsewhere.

Read full story

Author : Jan MichaelsRecently, the majority of Americans sent a clear message to the Republican party that we reject racism, bigotry and the usual politics of fear and small minded people This sent the Republican party into a panic and a desperate search for becoming more appealing to more than just rich white people and skinheads

To show what the Republican party is up against, Chip Saltsman, a leading RNC chair candidate, distributed an insensitive CD as a Holiday gift which included a song called, ‘Barak the magic Negro’ This might have not been such a big deal in the media if the major bigot and ultra conservative (and drug abusing criminal) Rush Limbaugh hadn’t played it on his show And of course, if we hadn’t just elected an African American President (and this realization also disgusts me)

To put what the Top Republican party members seem to represent in perspective, lets look at another racist group Remember David Duke? He is a white nationalist, former Louisiana State Representative, a perennial candidate in presidential primaries for the Democratic then Republican parties, and former Grand Wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan David Duke is also a fake image of a reasonable, well dressed version of the Republican’s Young Americans group

Behind the facade of his good looks, suits and intelligence are the slimy tendrils of hate backed by a horde of cross burning, intolerant murdering scum And David Duke has used these people to promote his message of fear of non-whites that (in his twisted view) are taking over the world

To be clear about this, David Duke’s, Rush Limbaugh’s and other racist’s base of followers can be easily picked out of society by their use of racial jokes, songs and sayings that belittle and make fun of groups of people that are different than them in some way The color of someone’s skin or race and religion are enough for these people to trigger their superiority complex

In this latest news about the Republican party, we also get to see inside the “back rooms” of it’s top members, and what’s showing is the same old racist garbage hiding behind the image of tolerance and acceptable behavior

With this brief glimpse of the beast behind the Republican image comes the strong suspicion that the Republicans are not trying to change or move away from it’s red meat base of bigots, it’s simply trying to put a nice, shiny face on the same old pile of reeking garbage, and the buzzing flies keep giving the scam away

Of course, the top Republicans will do damage control to preserve the image of a changing party, and squish this cockroach, but as everyone knows, if you kill one cockroach, there are still thousands more hiding somewhere in the dark places Jan Michaels is the creator of the Article Friendly Article Publishing Script for php & mysql, and can be found at: ArticleFriendly.com and PoliticalViewer.com Submitted By ArticleUnited.com

Read full story